JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 3, 2017

A- de 2017

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Aquiles Arrieta Gómez

✓Claimant Julio Lopez Granados Y Otros

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia T-660/15.

Los peticionarios argumentaron que en la decisión censurada la Sala de Revisión se apartó de la jurisprudencia de la Corporación, al desconocer su condición de población vulnerable.

Igualmente reprocharon el haber ordenado la intervención de los Alcaldías Municipales en las reuniones a realizar, porque dichas autoridades no habían sido vinculadas al proceso de tutela.

Por último alegaron la incongruencia entre la parte motiva y resolutiva de la providencia en mención.

La Sala Plena no encontró configurada causal alguna para declarar la nulidad rogada y, en consecuencia, decidió DENEGARLA.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. DENEGAR la solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia T-660 del 2015, proferida por la Sala Séptima de Revisión.
  2. SEGUNDO. Contra este pronunciamiento no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.